Quantcast
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8330

Re: MSA 2052 configuration sanity check

I understand all the RAID levels very well, hence the question, if not direct enough.

The question was intended to ask about RAID5/6 reliability re: very large disks.  Does the rebuild time/number of IOs required vs the UER (unrecoverable error rate) of the drives, with 2.4TB drives, create undue risk?  I could not find a spec on the 2.4TB SAS drives rate;  10^16?  10^15?

What's HPE's guidance on RAID5/6 on multi-TB HDDs with many spindles?  Where's the edge of the cliff?

And perhaps my terminology was inexact.  I'm looking to have both controllers actively working.  Each controller owning a virtual volume with 2 disk groups:

  1. 2 x 800GB SSD performance tier disk group
  2. 8 x 2.4TB HDD standard tier disk group

So, is that 2 pools, each of one vVol comprising 2 DG each?

If I have a spare SSD and HDD (I noted the spares) then wouldn't the MSA not bleed out the pages on an SSD failure because it would have a spare to incorporate?  Or is there no sparing for SSDs?


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8330

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>